If a powerful political figure in a corrupt country is filmed committing a crime by a surveillance camera, the consequences will depend on the specific circumstances of the case and the level of corruption in the country.
In a corrupt country, it is possible that the authorities may be unwilling to take action against a powerful political figure, even if there is evidence of their wrongdoing. This could be due to a variety of factors, including fear of reprisal, a desire to protect their own interests, or a belief that the individual is too powerful or influential to be held accountable.
In such a situation, it is possible that the video footage of the crime could be used as evidence in court, or that it could be released to the public in an effort to expose the wrongdoing and pressure the authorities to take action. However, it is also possible that the footage could be suppressed or that the individual could use their influence to avoid being held accountable for their actions.
Ultimately, the outcome will depend on the specific circumstances of the case and the level of corruption in the country. It is also possible that the incident could have wider implications for the political landscape of the country, such as leading to public outrage or calls for political change.